Stephen Evans

Follow author Add as friend Message author Subscribe to updates from author Subscribe via RSS
Stephen is a playwright and author of The Marriage of True Minds and A Transcendental Journey.

Amid the Ruins

"We cannot part with our friends. We cannot let our angels go. We do not see that they only go out, that archangels may come in. We are idolaters of the old. We do not believe in the riches of the soul, in its proper eternity and omnipresence. We do not believe there is any force in to-day to rival or recreate that beautiful yesterday. We linger in the ruins of the old tent, where once we had bread and shelter and organs, nor believe that the spirit can feed, cover, and nerve us again. We cannot again find aught so dear, so sweet, so graceful. But we sit and weep in vain. The voice of the Almighty saith, 'Up and onward for evermore!' We cannot stay amid the ruins."

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Compensation

Recent Comments
Katherine Gregor
I needed this, this morning. Thank you.
Sunday, 15 March 2015 09:11
Rosy Cole
Thanks for sharing this, Steve. It made me think of... http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/173019... Read More
Sunday, 15 March 2015 17:32
Stephen Evans
Love amid the ruins. I vaguely remember a movie of that title, Katherine Hepburn and Lawrence Olivier. It was wonderful to see th... Read More
Monday, 16 March 2015 04:15
2043 Hits
5 Comments

On Artificial Intelligence

Somehow the microwave always knows when to stop turning so the teapot handle is facing away from me.

 

 

 

Recent Comments
Rosy Cole
How to restore equanimity: Give it another 5 seconds and you could be in clover. Sorted.
Monday, 02 March 2015 12:36
Stephen Evans
But then there is also the thing where you never know if it's going to turn left to right or right to left. O the perils of altern... Read More
Monday, 02 March 2015 15:40
Rosy Cole
Clearly calls for quick reflexes and ambidexterity. Or you could boil a kettle. Just a thought. Mind you, with your reverse engi... Read More
Monday, 02 March 2015 23:19
2323 Hits
3 Comments

How Plato Decided the Oscars

Since 1927, the following comedies have won the Academy Award for Best Picture.

1934 – It Happened One Night

1938 – You Can’t take It With You

1963 – Tom Jones

1977 – Anne Hall

In more than eighty years, only four comedies have won the top award. Why this disrespect for the art of comedy?

I blame Plato.

The word Academy comes from ancient Greek. Originally it was a place. Maybe a person too. But definitely a place. And Plato started a sort of school there which took the name the Academy.

Originally the Academy was sort of like a club. A select group gathered, drank wine, and discussed the issues of the day, which happened to be subjects such as Beauty, Love, and the Good. Plato, being the smartest guy in the room, was sort of an intellectual bouncer at these events.

So since they were sitting around drinking wine and talking about Love and such, you would think there would be a lot of laughter. Plato, however, did not approve of laughter. This is odd, because his teacher Socrates had from most reports an excellent sense of humor. In fact, Plato even attributes this opinion of laughter to Socrates himself.

Plato wrote Dialogues, whose participants were Socrates and whatever sockpuppet interlocutors Plato decided to put up against him. As translated, these Socratic opponents sound like an ancient Magic 8 Ball: “Yes, Socrates, it is decidedly so”. But the idea of a group of men (and the occasional woman) sitting around and trying to reason their way to a better life seems quaint and somehow wonderful. We have mostly stopped trying in our time, divided between the Alreadydecideds and the Givenups.

Plato first mentions his concerns about laughter in his most famous work, The Republic, which describes his concept of the Just State. Socrates is discussing the qualities of the guardians (the rulers of the Just State) with a young Athenian named Adeimantus:

S:     Neither ought our guardians to be given to laughter. For a fit of laughter which has been indulged to excess almost always produces a violent reaction.

A:     So I believe.

S:     Then persons of worth, even if only mortal men, must not be represented as overcome by laughter, and still less must such a representation of the gods be allowed.

A:     Still less of the gods, as you say.

S:     Then we shall not suffer such an expression to be used about the gods as that of Homer when he describes how inextinguishable laughter arose among the blessed gods, when they saw Hephaestus bustling about the mansion.

Plato again alludes to his opinion on laughter in the dialogue Philebus, which is oddly named because the dialogee is not Philebus but a stand-in named Protarchus. But this time, Plato deals with a more general case. In this dialogue, Socrates is discussing whether pleasure or wisdom is better for mankind:

 

S:     Is not envy an unrighteous pleasure, and also an unrighteous pain?

P:     Most true.

S:     There is nothing envious or wrong in rejoicing at the misfortunes of enemies?

P:     Certainly not.

S:     But to feel joy instead of sorrow at the sight of our friends’ misfortunes—is not that wrong?

P:     Undoubtedly.

S:     Did we not say that ignorance was always an evil?

P:     True.

S:     And the three kinds of vain conceit in our friends which we enumerated—the vain conceit of beauty, of wisdom, and of wealth, are ridiculous if they are weak, and detestable when they are powerful: May we not say, as I was saying before, that our friends who are in this state of mind, when harmless to others, are simply ridiculous?

P:     They are ridiculous.

S:     And do we not acknowledge this ignorance of theirs to be a misfortune?

P:     Certainly.

S:     And do we feel pain or pleasure in laughing at it?

P:     Clearly we feel pleasure.

S:     And was not envy the source of this pleasure which we feel at the misfortunes of friends?

P:     Certainly.

S:     Then the argument shows that when we laugh at the folly of our friends, pleasure, in mingling with envy, mingles with pain, for envy has been acknowledged by us to be mental pain, and laughter is pleasant; and so we envy and laugh at the same instant.

P:     True.

So Plato really seems to have two complaints about laughter. First, laughter comes from someone laughing at someone else who seems ridiculous. I have to admit, I am not fond of this particular aspect of laughter either. Second, Plato says that laughter produces a violent reaction; that is, laughter can overcome us. He is concerned about this, because he thinks that it will degrade the person, god, or goddess who is overcome. For an idealist, Plato was strangely concerned about image.

 

For humans, I think what is important is why we laugh, rather than if. If we don’t laugh at all, we are in big trouble. For gods, if they don’t laugh, I don’t see how they can understand us humans. 

Recent Comments
Monika Schott PhD
Loved this read over breakfast - great way to start my day.
Sunday, 22 February 2015 20:09
Katherine Gregor
Brilliant! For me, I'll take François Rabelais: One inch of joy surmounts of grief a span, Because to laugh is proper to the man... Read More
Sunday, 22 February 2015 20:39
Anonymous
Someone in scripture said, "...a merry heart healeth the bones." A great doctor said, "humor (laughter) is our best friend." Volta... Read More
Monday, 23 February 2015 01:35
1313 Hits
3 Comments

Liebestraum

Moments there were, when out of death, and the rebellion of the flesh, there came to you, as you took stock of yourself, a dream of love.

Thomas Mann

The Magic Mountain 

 

b2ap3_thumbnail_Edgar-and-Daisy.jpg

 

We think of them, the missing ones,

Passed beyond past. Yet we would know.

Here and now if only we could ask

One simple question: Was it for love

Or for the dream of love that they endured?

 

 

Recent Comments
Rosy Cole
What I feel about that is, in the final analysis, there's really no difference. Loyalty to the source of inspiration - and endur... Read More
Saturday, 14 February 2015 18:37
Stephen Evans
There may be no difference. But I'm not sure that is comforting.
Saturday, 14 February 2015 21:29
Rosy Cole
These days, we demand far too much of relationships to make good our losses and keep us bouyant. Daisy and Edgar were committed to... Read More
Sunday, 15 February 2015 00:06
1558 Hits
4 Comments

Writing For Life

We are a small, friendly community who value writing as a tool for developing a brighter understanding of the world and humanity. We share our passions and experiences with one another and with a public readership. ‘Guest’ comments are welcome. No login is required. In Social Media we are happy to include interesting articles by other writers on any of the themes below. Enjoy!


Latest Blogs

A friend recently reminded me of the power in kindness when she asked, what makes an urban area kind? My first thought was, how can an object or mass...
The other evening, my wife and I went for a stroll along the Thames Path  not far from London's Chelsea Harbour and stopped to sit awhile in a  deligh...
“I was inspired by the marvelous example of Giacometti, the great sculptor. He always said that his dream was to do a bust so small that it could ente...
Over the years, I’ve written about some of life’s certainties — birth, death, time and change. You can guarantee we will all experience those things. ...

Latest Comments

Nicholas Mackey A life in trees
08 August 2020
Thank you, Rosy for reading and commenting.
Stephen Evans The Lessons of Gurnemanz
06 August 2020
Interesting -thank you! have to see if I can find those books. The Osiris story is in my Emerson p...
Rosy Cole The Lessons of Gurnemanz
06 August 2020
I read this today in Eliot's notes on The Wasteland:Not only the title, but the plan and a good deal...
Monika Schott PhD Expectations
03 August 2020
Rosy, I'm so touched by your beautiful description of my writing, it's never been described in that ...
Rosy Cole A life in trees
02 August 2020
Trees have such awesome vigour and staying power. There's a silver birch, fifty or sixty feet high, ...